Manual Mappings and Customizations
Last updated
Was this helpful?
When working with server-side tags, JENTIS provides full flexibility to either:
Use the default dynamic values provided by JENTIS (recommended).
Or apply a custom value (static string or your own variable) to override the defaults.
This is especially useful when you need to fine-tune how Google Consent Mode parameters are submitted, beyond the standard vendor-based mapping.

For all tags affiliated with Google (GA4, Google Ads, Floodlight, etc.), you can configure every available Consent Mode parameter.
npa: Non Personalized Ads flag (true/false)
gcut: Google Consent Update Type
gcd: Google Consent Default
gcu: Google Consent Update
gcs: Google Consent Status
dma_cps: Digital Market Act Parameters
By default, JENTIS automatically maps these parameters to system variables that it provides out-of-the-box. These variables always reflect the latest consent information based on:
Vendor settings in the JENTIS Data Capturing Platform (DCP)
The user’s consent status from your CMP (if mapped)
This ensures your tags are kept in sync without requiring manual input.
If you need a different behavior, you can override the defaults:
Static values: Enter a fixed string or boolean ("true", "false", "granted", "denied", etc.).
Custom variables: Use your own JENTIS-defined variables to inject dynamic values.
For example:
You could force npa = true for a specific tag, regardless of vendor consent.
Or you could use a custom variable that determines gcs (Consent Status) based on business rules outside of JENTIS vendors.
Manual mappings are useful when:
You need to apply different Consent Mode values for specific Google tags.
You want to test or enforce static consent states.
Your organization has custom requirements not fully covered by vendor-based mappings.
JENTIS defaults provide a safe and consistent mapping for all Consent Mode parameters. However, you retain full control to customize or override them on a per-tag basis.
This flexibility allows you to:
Rely on automated vendor-driven consent management.
Or enforce custom rules for advanced consent handling scenarios.
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Was this helpful?